February 2007 Archive

« January 2007 | Main | March 2007 »

Awards Overload: No More Envelopes, Please

Here’s my dirty little secret: I have not one teeny iota of interest in awards ceremony shows. The Oscars, the Emmys, the People’s Choice Awards, the Grammys? Nope. Nada, zilch, zip. None of them do anything for me. Amazing, huh?

I know I must not be alone here – but hey, it certainly feels like it as I write this late Sunday afternoon when the rest of the planet is on countdown to The Big Event. The E! channel is positively on overdrive – Oscar’s even managed to interrupt its “all Anna, all the time” coverage – and my fave gossips mags have felled whole forests to feed the frenzy. But what really pushed me over the edge was the statue-shaped sugar cookies in my local gourmet shop. What’s next: “Happy Oscars” greeting cards? Giant inflatable gold statues on red carpeted front lawns? Academy Award-themed Happy Meals?

For the record, I have nothing against awards shows and the Oscars in particular. In fact, I love movies (I’ve even seen most all the films up for awards) and indulge in a chick flick habit that someone who pledged to love me in sickness and in health recently described as “bordering on obsession.” I just don’t really care who wins what, what they say when they do, who they thank, or even (collective gasp here) what they wear.

Maybe I’m just on American Idol overload; after all, there is only just so much brain matter that I can afford to devote to this stuff. Then again, if Idol cast-off Jennifer Hudson gets her oh-so-well deserved golden statue (take that, Simon Scowl), I might just have to reconsider my anti-awards show position.

February 26, 2007 at 05:22pm | Permalink | Comments (5)

Laurie’s Reel Thing Chick Flick Review: "Music and Lyrics"

The ads are pushing “Music and Lyrics” in a major way as “the perfect date movie.” But as my own permanent in-house date is allergic to all things Hugh Grant, I graciously gave him an excused absence and went to see it instead with Lauren, one of my most trusted chick flick chums.

My hubby’s opinion not withstanding, you really have got to hand it to Hugh. He might just be the poster boy for image rehabilitation. I mean, wasn’t he involved in some unsavory scene a while back with a “date”-for-hire while he was supposedly hot-and-heavy with model Elizabeth Hurley? I mean, it wouldn’t (and didn’t) stop me from going to see him on the big screen; I’m just curious if I’m the only one who a) remembered and b) is still surprised he’d cheat on someone as gorgeous as Hurley – and pay for the privilege.

Anyhoo, the movie. As you might have guessed, “Casablanca” it is not. What it is: a pleasant little bubble gummy update to the whole “meet cute” genre of romantic relationship movies. Grant and Drew Barrymore (loved her in “Riding with Boys”) hook up after her ditzy-but-adorable character comes round to water his plants. He convinces her to help him with the lyrics of a song he’s writing for a Britney-like pop princess, and voila! The duet makes beautiful (or in this case, commercially successful) music together.

It’s fun. There are some laughs. And the flashback music videos of Grant as a pop icon are a scream. But please, spare your significant-other-of-the-male-persuasion and borrow a ‘tween or two instead. They’ll be the perfect cover should you bump into any of your more highbrow-minded movie-going pals at the multi-plex.

February 24, 2007 at 07:42am | Permalink | Comments (3)

The New DUI: Driving While Distracted

Uh oh. Better buckle up. It seems that more and more states are considering banning drivers from engaging in activities they call distracting.

Here in New York and elsewhere, we’ve (reluctantly) gotten used to hands-free cell phone chatting and conversations routinely interrupted by frantic instructions to “oh (insert four-letter word of your choosing here), hold on, there’s a police car.” But these newest restrictions could really put a cramp on the whole multi-tasking car culture as we suburban household CEOs (alternately known as Captains of the Carpools) know it.

Get this: Vermont is considering prohibiting eating, drinking, smoking, reading, writing, personal grooming, playing an instrument, or (this last one is downright cruel) interacting with pets while driving. Okay, cigarettes make me sick and I am a proud piano lesson drop-out. And I have indeed noticed that reading about Brittany’s latest parenting faux pas while driving really does adversely impact my level of reading comprehension.

But putting pedal to the metal without a cup of java or "interacting" with my Lab? Whoa. Talk about distracting. Clearly these lawmakers have not seen me handle my morning commute caffeine-free or steer my way through errands while ignoring 85 pounds of panting pet.

The rub is that the Green Mountain State is actually one of my favorite getaway destinations. But I might just have to forgo any road trips there if these new laws pass. Then again, maybe I'll just let my husband drive while I work my way through a cone of Ben & Jerry’s and play my favorite musical instrument, the iPod.

February 22, 2007 at 07:05am | Permalink | Comments (14)

The Cop Out Quiz: Hello, Helio-Mom?

Think you might be hovering over your kids a tad too much? Take this quick quiz to see if you are a helicopter parent by answering "yes" or "no" to the following:

Do you...

(1) ..."help” your second grader with her dinosaur diorama by casting and hand-painting a dozen anatomically correct, to-scale plaster models of Tyrannosaurus Rex and friends?

(2) ...describe a Baby Einstein video as a “compelling film?”

(3) ...send your teenaged son on the ski team overnight with clip-on mittens?

(4) ...suggest your middle schooler’s civic textbook as the next selection for your book group?

(5) ...feng shui your Freshman’s dorm room?

(6) ...request that your fifth grader’s desk be moved away from the window and “out of the draft?”

(7) ...nametape your 14-year-old daughter’s shoelaces?

(8) ...cut the crusts off your six-foot-tall son’s submarine sandwiches?

(9) ...reply ”we almost have our essay done” when asked about your high school senior’s college plans?

(10) ...order the Little League T-shirt in a larger size for yourself? And you wear it to all the games? To which you bring homemade chocolate chip cookies for the coach?

If you answered “yes” to three or less of the above, there’s still hope for you to have a healthy relationship with what’s-their-names – you know, your kids.

If you answered “yes” to five of the above, consider seeking professional help before you come down for a crash landing.

If you answered “yes” to seven or more of the above, it may be time for you to surgically detach yourself from your offspring.

February 19, 2007 at 07:08am | Permalink | Comments (2)

Laurie’s Reel Thing Chick Flick Review: "Because I Said So"

Here’s the deal: I had been dying to see this movie since I first spotted the previews back when I was able to bite into a Snickers bar circa Halloween ’06 without cracking a tooth. First off, the title is brilliant. And then, I loved Diane Keaton in “Something’s Gotta Give” (who didn’t?). So I made plans to see "Because I Said So" with my sister the day after it opened.

But that morning, I woke to a review in my local paper that called the movie “excruciating.” Hoo boy. That did give pause. (I didn’t recall ever having seen that adjective in print about a big comedy before.) So, like the lemming I can be, I wimped out and convinced my sister to see “Catch and Release” instead (which was surprisingly good, even touching, BTW).

I finally made it to “Because I Said So” the following week, after having exhausted all possible alternatives. And let me go on the record here as saying that that’ll teach me not to listen to a reviewer with a Y chromosome about any future romantic comedies. Granted, “Because I Said So” was not the best example of the much-maligned chick flick genre that I have ever seen. And yes, Keaton was a little (okay, a lot) over-the-top and slap-sticky (her character was a pastry chef and the sight gags with her dropping and/or falling into her elaborate themed cakes got old, fast). But hey, it was cute and we laughed.

And, if you’ve ever been, had, or known a teenaged or older daughter, you will so totally relate to the crazy love that makes a mom do the sometimes nutty things she does for (or to) her little-girl-all-grown-up, because she just wants her to be happy. (Is that so much to ask?) Plus, Mandy Moore’s rocker boy love interest Gabriel Macht is a hottie.

So yes, go see this movie. Why? (You knew this was coming): Because I said so.

February 16, 2007 at 07:27am | Permalink | Comments (4)

Forecast Frenzy

As I write this on Wednesday afternoon, we’re in the throes of our first Snow Day (actually, that would be Freezing-Sleet-and-Hail Day) of the season here in the New York ‘burbs.

Of course, with even the hint of precipitation in the forecast, the weather hype started to kick into full gear Tuesday morning. You know (cue ominous music here): “We interrupt this 'my-slutty-ex-best-friend-slept-with-my-babysitter’s-boyfriend’s-work-buddy' program to bring you the latest breaking news on 'Winter Storm Watch '07.' Don't change that channel!” Indeed, the whole weather biz has gotten so whacked out that the meteorologists (that would be the weather folks to you and me) routinely try to whip us up into a lather about conditions predicted for eight days out, all the better to keep us glued to the tube.

In fact, they’ve gotten so far ahead of themselves and so precise lately that one day soon I predict we’ll be hearing reports about 12 snowflakes scheduled to fall on the south side of Maple Avenue next Tuesday at 7:13 pm. (Until then, hope you’re safe, warm, and dry wherever you are!)

PS: And while I’m on the subject of forecast frenzy, what’s up with all those people charging the grocery stores to stock up at the first whimper of foul weather? Here’s my little secret for avoiding that whole mass supermarket mania: Parmalat milk in the boxes; stays for months in the pantry without refrigeration. Stock up on a few of these babies and voila! The running-out-of-milk problem solved.

February 15, 2007 at 07:08am | Permalink | Comments (1)

Married-Speak for "I Love You"

Yes, of course I love all that hearts and flowers stuff. But this year, instead of a box of chocolates, a dozen roses, or a romantic dinner a deux, I am hoping and hinting for an expression of my Valentine’s feelings that’ll have a longer shelf life than a carton of yogurt.

So honey, if you’re reading this, don’t bother saying it with flowers. And forget cheesy proclamations of undying love and devotion. Just liberally sprinkle these handy phrases throughout our day-to-day life; in married-speak, each translates loud and clear to “I love you”:

“That’s all you bought?”

“Those pants make you look too thin.”

“You wear make-up? Why?”

“I totally agree. You can never have too many handbags/shoes/earrings.”

“I’m just going to raise the thermostat.”

“What gorgeous blonde/brunette/redhead?”

“Try to spend a little more this month.”

“I have to wear a jacket and tie? Terrific!”

“Let’s go to the jewelry store.”

“You are so right. About everything.”

PS: And now a special shout out to my Valentine:
I love you, honey! (Whoops, I mean, “Of course your parents can come and stay for a month!” and ”Wow. Look at your muscles!")

February 12, 2007 at 07:37am | Permalink | Comments (16)

Day Three of Detox

I’m cranky. I can't think straight. And I’m bouncing off the walls. It's Day Three of Detox, and I’m channeling Diana Ross in the movie “Lady Sings the Blues,” when she’s going cold turkey in her padded jail cell. Forget cigarettes, Jimmy Choos, or crack cocaine. Caffeine has got me in its grip. And hello, I know I’m not the only one. A super-sized coffee-to-go has become the accessory-du-jour for celeb and soccer moms alike.

Yup, a cup of joe is definitely my own mother’s little helper. It started innocently enough when my kids were small – one cup to get me up enough to gently shove 'em onto the school bus, another later in the day to push me through the carpooling, and lots in between. But because my doctor says caffeine is causing my sleepless nights, I've decided to embark on my own personal rehab – cutting down on the number of cups I drink per day, switching to a half-caffeine, half-decaf brew, and even buying caffeine-free Diet Pepsi. Though I’ll NEVER give up that morning mug, I am cutting back.

So how’s it going? Well, just today I showed up at the wrong time for a hair appointment, took a DVD back to Blockbusters only to find the box was empty, AND tried to return something from Staples to CVS. Fortunately, after giving up on getting anything done, my friend Lucy, home nursing the flu, called to ask would I mind picking her up a pound of ground Starbucks house blend? Mind? One good ten-minute whiff of the air in my local Starbucks and I felt positively revived.

So now that I’m breaking my grip on my drug of choice, I’m looking for a good substitute. Please, please, please tell me they make caffeine-free chocolate.

February 10, 2007 at 07:05am | Permalink | Comments (7)

When You Gotta Go, You Gotta Go, Girl!

We’re sitting in a production of Les Miz on Broadway, closing in on intermission. “Get ready,” I whisper frantically to my husband, sitting on the aisle. “The minute she sings that last note, I’m climbing over you and sprinting up the aisle.” He looks at me like I am possessed. “Whaddya mean? What’s the rush?” What’s the RUSH? Any woman reading this knows just the rush I am talking about. Intermission means the mad dash to get on line for the ladies room.

Okay, the curtain's closing, the lights are going up, and it's go, go, go! But, invariably, by the time I sprint down the aisle and to the facilities located in the bowels of the theater, there's already a line of 67 other women snaking along the hallway leading to the ladies room. Yet, just a few guys are self-consciously slipping in and out of the men's room.

So what’s up with that exactly? Don’t real guys relieve themselves? And haven’t they heard of what we moms call the “preventative pee” – as in, “go now even if you don’t have to ‘cause who knows when you’ll have another opportunity”?

PS: And why can’t theaters build bigger ladies rooms anyway?

February 08, 2007 at 07:57am | Permalink | Comments (4)

Bottoms Up! A Top Notch Idea

Okay, let’s file this idea under “why’d they take so long to come up with it?” Apparently, the next new thing on the consumer horizon is the negative-calorie drink. Chug down one of these babies, like Celsius or Envgia, and you apparently actually burn calories (supposedly 77 calories for 12 ounces of the former, and 60 to 100 for three 12-ounce cans of the latter).

The people who are paid the big bucks for thinking up ideas like these in order to get some of our hard-earned cash into their companies’ hot little hands, call this “value-added marketing.” I am personally ALL over this concept. I say, let my products work for me. The possibilities are endless: a couch that cures your cellulite when you lie on it to watch a beeped-over Idol-wannabe curse out Simon, a trashy gossip mag that boosts your IQ when you check out the latest celeb “before” plastic surgery pix, the SUV that zaps zits and wrinkles as you carpool the kids to karate.

In fact, you know what would be really great? A piece of furniture that babysat the kiddies and kept them entertained 24/7 so we could chug our negative-calorie drinks while reading our IQ-enhancing celeb rags on our cellulite-busting couches. (Whoops. My bad. Those clever little marketers already came up with the TV.)

PS: So what fab new product would you be willing to part with big bucks for?

February 05, 2007 at 07:04am | Permalink | Comments (9)

Laurie’s Reel Thing Chick Flick Review: "Notes on a Scandal"

The other afternoon, my pal Ellen (one of my main chick flick companions) and I caught a showing of “Notes on a Scandal.”Whoa. Talk about tension. This movie had me from the get-go – and then it just didn’t let go. All right, in the interest of full disclosure, I didn’t technically see the first seven-and-a-half minutes of it because by mistake I first went to our usual (and in this case, wrong) theater (you know, the one with the free parking) but Ellen did an admirable job of quickly whispering me up to speed.

“Notes” is not fluffy, romantic comedy fare (not that there’s anything wrong with that; I'll give up snaps for a good “Legally Blonde”-type flick any day). It is definitely on the dark side. But boy, talk about wicked fun. Right from the start (okay, right from the time I came in late), I was HOOKED. The whole thing is just so perfectly suspenseful and creepy. Another of my friends called it disturbing and hard to watch, which yes, it can be – there’s a teacher/student liason, an unrequited lesbian love thing, and some major stalking going on – but personally, I was totally engrossed. I am not going to ruin it here for you, but basically the Cate Blanchette character is being emotionally blackmailed by the Judi Dench character (and for the record, they both SO deserve their Oscar nominations; their performances are brilliant). Judi knows a secret about Cate that could cause her whole life to implode – or as the movie ads say, “One person’s mistake is another’s opportunity.”

The whole fragile alliance unravels after a classic mom dilemma scene. Cate’s in the car with her family rushing to see her son’s play and Judi appears and begs her to accompany her instead to the vet, to help her deal with her beloved cat being put to sleep. You can see Cate-as-mummy really struggling here, but you just know she has no choice. Apparently Judi's character didn't get the memo: the cute child always trumps the whacked out blackmailer, no matter how juicy the goods she has on mumsy.

So tell me: if you’ve seen “Notes,” whaddya think? (And, if you haven’t, GO!)

PS: Ellen and I both agreed that our particular other halves would’ve hated “Notes,” but I can definitely see where some guys would like it. Your call; you know your own significant other better than moi.

February 03, 2007 at 07:12am | Permalink | Comments (2)

Parenting Paradoxes to Ponder

Here are a couple of parenting paradoxes to ponder. Can anyone please tell me why:

1A) The more annoying the toy, the longer its life span.
Or, on the other hand:
1B) The more educational/productive the toy, the sooner it dies.

And what about:

2A) The more expensive the piece of clothing, the greater likelihood of it going AWOL.
Or, its flip-side:
2B) Why don’t they ever lose the hand-me-downs, only the full-price splurges?

Just curious. Any thoughts?

February 01, 2007 at 07:26am | Permalink | Comments (4)
Back to Pregnancy&Parentingt

About Me

Lauries Picture
An edgier, hipper (as in cooler, not wider-in-the-thighs) 21st century Erma Bombeck, writer Laurie Yarnell blogs about life with her family, friends, neighbors, acquaintances, and such buddies as the computer geek-on-call and her local snooty barista. (Amazingly, some of them actually still speak to her.)

Recent Entries

RSS

Favorite Posts

Archives

Favorite Links